Question & Answer
Question
Specific concerns for migration to/from TWS z/OS 9.2.0 ?
Cause
migration
Answer
For general issues with TWSz (COMPID 5697WSZ01 ) migration please refer to technote 1608030:
http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21608030
There are some specific issues involving TWSz 9.2 which will be discussed here;
(1) EQQJOBS – new/changed samples - these SEQQSAMP members should be reviewed after running EQQJOBS:
EQQBENCO
• New sample to encrypt passwords in the OSLCOPTS statement contained in
the EQQPARM library member as specified by the OSLCPARM keyword in the
OPCOPTS statement. E.g. : OSLCPARM(STDOSLC).
EQQSMLOG
• New sample to repro the inactive MLOG into a GDG data set.
EQQPCS12
• New sample to allocate dthe GDG root where to archive the MLOG if you are
using the new switch MLOG function
EQQPCS02
• Old sample allocating new data set for alternate MLOG (EQQMLOG2) used by
the new switch MLOG function
(2) Started task JCL changes
The only change is related to the switch MLOG new function that requires
the usage of an alternate MLOG data set.
This function is applicable both to tracker and controller: if used the
related started task must contain the DD statement EQQMLOG2 pointing
to the alternate MLOG data set.
(3) VSAM migration
Note: In general problems with fallback to the previous release can be avoided if new
features are NOT implemented until you are confident that a "backwards" migration
will not be needed.
VSAM records layout is not changed in TWSz 9.2.0 but migration is
- needed anyway because we need to:
- This value is used to check that the product is using the correct version of data sets.
- The field containing parallel server value was big enough to store new limit but check
must be added to avoid fallback problems
• Changes occurred in previous release
- Migrating from 8.6.0 to 9.2.0 we need to apply the layout changes of 9.1.0
- show the id of the just migrated single application
- EQQICNVS sample
(A) VSAM migration - Application Data base (AD)
ADR migration (TWSz 8.6.0 TWSz 9.2.0)
• Resolution criteria defaulted to Closest preceding
• Mandatory option defaulted to No.
ADR fallback (TWSz 9.2.0 TWSz 8.6.0)
• New resolution criteria are converted to Closest Preceding, Mandatory option is converted to "NO", and Msg EQQIC63W is issued
EQQIC63W APPLICATION &AD HAS EXTERNAL OR CONDITIONAL PREDECESSORS
EQQIC63I USING RESOLUTION OPTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ROLLED BACK: THEY WILL BE
EQQIC63I CONVERTED TO OLD CRITERIA (CLOSEST PRECEDING, NO MANDATORY)
• New value blank for deadline is defaulted to 002400: Msg EQQIC65W is issued
EQQIC65W APPLICATION &AD HAS A RUN CYCLE WITH BLANK DEADLINE THAT CANNOT
EQQIC65I BE ROLLED BACK: DEADLINE WILL BE SET TO 002400
• New value blank for input arrival time will cause AD skip: Msg EQQIC64W is issued
EQQIC64W APPLICATION &AD HAS A RUN CYCLE WITH BLANK INPUT ARRIVAL AND
EQQIC64I CANNOT BE ROLLED BACK: APPLICATION WILL BE SKIPPED
(B) VSAM migration – Workstation data base (WS)
WS migration (TWSz 8.6.0, TWSz 9.1.0 TWSz 9.2.0)
• No new defaulting is needed.
WS fallback (TWSz 9.2.0 TWSz 8.6.0)
• New run cycle groups are supported only from 9.1.0 on, so they cause the record skip and Msg
EQQIC59W is issued:
EQQIC59W A FALLBACK CANNOT BE PERFORMED ON RUN CYCLE GROUP &RGNAM.
EQQIC59I IT IS NOT SUPPORTED IN EARLIER VERSIONS OF THE PRODUCT.
EQQIC59I THE RECORD IS SKIPPED.
WS fallback (TWSz 9.2.0 TWSz 8.6.0, TWSz 9.1.0)
• A value of parallel server greater than 99 is not supported in previous releases so it is defaulted to 99 and Msg EQQIC67W is issued:
EQQIC67W IN THE FALLBACK PROCESS OF THE WORKSTATION DATABASE, THE NUMBER OF
EQQIC67I PARALLEL SERVERS DEFINED FOR SOME &WSNAM INTERVALS WAS FORCED TO 99
EQQIC67I BECAUSE THE 99 LIMIT WAS EXCEEDED.
(C) VSAM migration – Long Term Plan data base (LTP)
LTP migration (TWSz 8.6.0 TWSz 9.2.0)
• LTP header LTPREMSHIFT is defaulted to 0
• LTP occurrence Mandatory pending predecessor number is defaulted to 0.
LTP fallback (TWSz 9.2.0 TWSz 8.6.0)
• Mandatory pending predecessors are removed and the dependency referring to them are marked as
deleted. Msg EQQIC69W is issued:
EQQIC69W LTP OCCURRENCE &APPL &IA HAS MANDATORY PENDING PREDECESSORS:
EQQIC69I THEY HAVE BEEN MARKED AS DELETED.
• Blank deadlines are not supported in 8.6.0 and defaulted to 2071-12-31 24.00: Msg EQQIC60W is
issued:
EQQIC60W INPUT LTP OCCURRENCE &APPL &IA HAS A BLANK DEADLINE. IT IS SET
EQQIC60I TO A DEFAULT VALUE (2071-12-31 24.00)
(D) VSAM migration – Current Plan data base (CP)
CP migration (TWSz 8.6.0 , TWSz 9.1.0 TWSz 9.2.0)
• No new defaulting is needed.
CP fallback (TWSz 9.2.0 TWSz 8.6.0)
• Mandatory pending occurrences (status M) are not supported in TWSz 8.6.0 and are skipped: Msg
EQQIC61W is issued:
EQQIC61W INPUT CURRENT PLAN OCCURRENCE &AD &IA HAS A MANDATORY PENDING
EQQIC61I STATUS. IT IS NOT SUPPORTED IN EARLIER VERSION. THIS OCCURRENCE IS
EQQIC61I SKIPPED
• Operation having mandatory pending predecessors are not supported in TWSz 8.6.0 and cannot be
skipped. For this reason migration is not stopped but fails with RC=8: Msg EQQIC62E is issued:
EQQIC62E ROLL-BACK MIGRATION NOT POSSIBLE. JOBS IN MANDATORY PENDING
EQQIC62I STATUS MUST BE REMOVED. CHECK FOLLOWING OPERATION:
EQQIC62I &AD &IA &OPER FAILURE
CP fallback (TWSz 9.2.0 TWSz 8.6.0, TWSz 9.1.0)
• A value of parallel server greater than 99 is not supported in previous releases so it is defaulted to 99
and Msg EQQIC68W is issued:
EQQIC68W IN THE FALLBACK PROCESS OF THE CUURENT PLAN, THE NUMBER OF
EQQIC68I PARALLEL SERVERS DEFINED FOR SOME &WSNAM INTERVALS WAS FORCED TO 99
EQQIC68I BECAUSE THE 99 LIMIT WAS EXCEEDED.
NEW
(E) VSAM migration – XD data base
XD migration (TWSz 8.6.0 , TWSz 9.1.0 TWSz 9.2.0)
• No new defaulting is needed.
XD fallback (TWSz 9.2.0 TWSz 8.6.0)
• New records XD03 and XD12 are not supported in TWSz 8.6.0 and are simply skipped.
[{"Product":{"code":"SSRULV","label":"IBM Workload Scheduler for z\/OS"},"Business Unit":{"code":"BU058","label":"IBM Infrastructure w\/TPS"},"Component":"--","Platform":[{"code":"PF035","label":"z\/OS"}],"Version":"8.6.0;9.1.0;9.2.0","Edition":"","Line of Business":{"code":"LOB35","label":"Mainframe SW"}}]
Was this topic helpful?
Document Information
Modified date:
13 September 2019
UID
swg21672929