A fix is available
APAR status
Closed as program error.
Error description
Time elapsed UCA's are fired multiple times when deployed to Runtime server. The number of times the UCA would be fired is based on the number of deployed snapshots to Runtime server. Apparently this is related to previous snapshots not being deactivated properly. 1. Create a new process application. 2. Create a general system service (UCA Service), add one Date variable (my_date) and add one server script with the following code in it: log.error("this service was fired by UCA on new SNAPSHOT - snap1 at " + tw.local.my_date); 3. Create a time elapsed UCA and choose "UCA Service" that we created on step #2 for this UCA to fire. Make UCA to fire every 15 minutes (you may check SLA update UCA in Process Portal stock Process app to see how to schedule your UCA to fire every 15 min's). 4. Create a new snapshot of this process app - snap1. 5. Deploy the snap1 to Runtime server. Check the logs once in 15 min's you should be able to see messages like: [2/15/12 2:30:00:059 PST] 00000656 wle_javascrip E this service was fired by UCA on new SNAPSHOT - snap1 at Wed Feb 15 02:30:00 PST 2012 So far everything works as expected. and you may notice that this single snapshot is set as Default and Active. 6. Modify UCA service to log a different message and create a new snapshot (snap2) and deploy it to Runtime environment. So, what you should have at this stage is - snap1 that was deactivated and snap2 that became Active and Default Check the logs every 15 min's: UCA will be fired from the new snapshot (snap2) BUT it would be fired TWO times!!! Here are the records: [2/15/12 3:15:00:193 PST] 00000679 wle_ucaexcept I CWLLG0194I: Execution of task Execute UCA time_UCA, on set schedule is beginning. [2/15/12 3:15:00:271 PST] 00000679 wle_javascrip E this service was fired by UCA on new SNAPSHOT - snap2 at Wed Feb 15 03:15:00 PST 2012 [2/15/12 3:15:00:287 PST] 0000067b wle_ucaexcept I CWLLG0194I: Execution of task Execute UCA time_UCA, on set schedule is beginning. [2/15/12 3:15:00:302 PST] 0000067b wle_javascrip E this service was fired by UCA on new SNAPSHOT - snap2 at Wed Feb 15 03:15:00 PST 2012 7.Create yet another snapshot - snap3 and also change the message in the UCA service, so, that you can distinguish between all the snaps I deployed. Once deployed make it Active and Default. And look at this: [2/15/12 3:30:00:034 PST] 00000695 wle_ucaexcept I CWLLG0194I: Execution of task Execute UCA time_UCA, on set schedule is beginning. [2/15/12 3:30:00:050 PST] 00000695 wle_javascrip E this service was fired by UCA on new SNAPSHOT - snap3! at Wed Feb 15 03:30:00 PST 2012 [2/15/12 3:30:00:081 PST] 00000697 wle_ucaexcept I CWLLG0194I: Execution of task Execute UCA time_UCA, on set schedule is beginning. [2/15/12 3:30:00:097 PST] 00000697 wle_javascrip E this service was fired by UCA on new SNAPSHOT - snap3! at Wed Feb 15 03:30:00 PST 2012 [2/15/12 3:30:00:128 PST] 00000699 wle_ucaexcept I CWLLG0194I: Execution of task Execute UCA time_UCA, on set schedule is beginning. [2/15/12 3:30:00:144 PST] 00000699 wle_javascrip E this service was fired by UCA on new SNAPSHOT - snap3! at Wed Feb 15 03:30:00 PST 2012 The UCA is fired three times now which is not correct.
Local fix
N/A
Problem summary
Upon deactivation of an Under Cover Agent, either implicit by deactivating the respective snapshot, by marking another snapshot as default or explicitly via the Exposing tab on the Process Admin Console the already scheduled UCA events are not properly canceled. This leads to duplicate UCA execution. This fix ensures proper UCA cancelation. Please note: Having installed this fix, there might be situations with the execution of superflous UCAs, where the following NullPointerException can be seen in the log: [5/28/12 0:05:00:102 HKT] 00000024 wle_ucaexcept E CWLLG0188E: An exception occurred scheduling the next execution for task 530,248 with description ''Execute UCA XYZ_InvokeMPFBPMResetPendProcess_UCA, on set schedule''. Error: null java.lang.NullPointerException at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.TaskManager.cancelTasks(Ta skManager.java:115) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Engine.scheduleNextExecuti on(Engine.java:907) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Engine.scheduleNextExecuti on(Engine.java:885) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Engine.access$1700(Engine. java:72) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Engine$9.execute(Engine.ja va:874) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Engine$9.execute(Engine.ja va:872) at com.lombardisoftware.utility.db.DbUtils.executeWithConnection(Db Utils.java:36) at com.lombardisoftware.utility.db.DbUtils$1.doInTransaction(DbUtil s.java:75) at com.lombardisoftware.server.core.TXCommand$3.call(TXCommand.java :87) at com.lombardisoftware.utility.spring.ProgrammaticTransactionSuppo rt$1.doInTransaction(ProgrammaticTransactionSupport.java:317) at org.springframework.transaction.jta.WebSphereUowTransactionManag er$UOWActionAdapter.run(WebSphereUowTransactionManager.java:306) at com.ibm.ws.uow.UOWManagerImpl.runUnderNewUOW(UOWManagerImpl.java :1067) at com.ibm.ws.uow.UOWManagerImpl.runUnderUOW(UOWManagerImpl.java:62 8) at org.springframework.transaction.jta.WebSphereUowTransactionManag er.execute(WebSphereUowTransactionManager.java:252) at com.lombardisoftware.utility.spring.ProgrammaticTransactionSuppo rt.executeInNewTransaction(ProgrammaticTransactionSupport.java:3 12) at com.lombardisoftware.utility.spring.ProgrammaticTransactionSuppo rt.execute(ProgrammaticTransactionSupport.java:192) at com.lombardisoftware.server.core.TXCommand.executeInDeadlockRetr yLoop(TXCommand.java:85) at com.lombardisoftware.utility.db.DbUtils.executeInTransaction(DbU tils.java:72) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Engine.scheduleNextExecuti on(Engine.java:872) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Engine.executeTasks(Engine .java:405) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Timer.executeTasks(Timer.j ava:137) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Timer.access$400(Timer.jav a:32) at com.lombardisoftware.server.scheduler.Timer$TimerRunnable.run(Ti mer.java:116) at com.lombardisoftware.client.delegate.common.WebsphereDelegateHel per$2$1.run(WebsphereDelegateHelper.java:78) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.jav a:284) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:573) at com.ibm.websphere.security.auth.WSSubject.doAs(WSSubject.java:19 4) at com.ibm.websphere.security.auth.WSSubject.doAs(WSSubject.java:15 1) at com.lombardisoftware.client.delegate.common.WebsphereDelegateHel per.doAs(WebsphereDelegateHelper.java:150) at com.lombardisoftware.client.delegate.common.WebsphereDelegateHel per$2.run(WebsphereDelegateHelper.java:74) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:736) If these NullPointerExceptions correlate with the executiontime of the superflous UCAs, they can be ignored because they are benign.
Problem conclusion
Problem fixed iFix available on top of V751 GA
Temporary fix
Comments
APAR Information
APAR number
JR41966
Reported component name
BPM STANDARD
Reported component ID
5725C9500
Reported release
751
Status
CLOSED PER
PE
NoPE
HIPER
NoHIPER
Special Attention
NoSpecatt
Submitted date
2012-02-17
Closed date
2012-06-05
Last modified date
2012-06-05
APAR is sysrouted FROM one or more of the following:
APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following:
JR41970 JR41971
Fix information
Fixed component name
BPM STANDARD
Fixed component ID
5725C9500
Applicable component levels
R751 PSY
UP
[{"Line of Business":{"code":"LOB45","label":"Automation"},"Business Unit":{"code":"BU053","label":"Cloud & Data Platform"},"Product":{"code":"SSFTDH","label":"IBM Business Process Manager Standard"},"Platform":[{"code":"PF025","label":"Platform Independent"}],"Version":"7.5.1"}]
Document Information
Modified date:
07 October 2021